1. The Night of the Shooting Stars definitely has aspects of neorealism. It tells a fairly realistic story of a group of Tuscan Italians making their way to find American soldiers. The story has its neorealism events. It has tragic moments, like people gathering in a church when that church gets bombed with them inside. And it has its moments that catch you off guard. Like the group of boys peeping at the woman in the middle of the night, and other strange sexual encounters that we don’t expect and can even make us uncomfortable.
The film also rejects neorealism and puts in more dramatic, cinematic qualities. Like while the group is waiting for the bombing to begin, we can hear a few individual thoughts and memories about their homes. And when the bombing takes place, there are close up shots of their ears to show that they can hear it, and to put a more dramatic effect on the scenario.
2. Night of the Shooting Stars seemed more like a drama instead of a documentary. Rome Open City, being more neorealist, looked more like a documentary. It even had real archival footage of soldiers marching through the city. Night of the Shooting Stars had more dramatic elements in the way things were presented, like close up shots of the ears to hear sounds and hearing individual thoughts. And it had a more happy ending.
3. The view of the child may mean innocence, but I didn’t see much of it. She didn’t look that innocent when she was smashing the remaining eggs that she already sat on. The only thing that might come from a child’s point of view is how we don’t see much history or back story to the characters. I found some parts confusing to see people act a certain way towards other characters. There could have been some romantic pasts between some, but we don’t know it. All we see are people acting sexually to each other for no reason, like eating a piece of watermelon after a woman was bathing herself in it.